Reinterpretation of a major terrane boundary in the northern Svalbard Caledonides based on metamorphic fingerprinting of rocks in northern Spitsbergen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tectonic models for development of the Svalbard Caledonides depend on reliable assessment of the metamorphic evolution of the various basement provinces involved. The Mosselhalvøya Group (MG) and the Atomfjella Complex (AC) have previously been assigned to the Nordaustlandet and West Ny-Friesland terranes, respectively. New analytical data and petrographic observations indicate that both units experienced two-stage metamorphism under similar pressure–temperature (P–T) conditions. Two stages of amphibolite facies metamorphism (M1 and M2) are clearly recorded by garnet and staurolite porphyroblast textures. The results of thermodynamic phase equilibrium modeling indicate that peak M2 metamorphism occurred at ∼7–7.5 kbar and 590–600 °C in both units. Zirconium-in-rutile trace element thermometry confirms the temperature estimates for M1 and M2 stages of metamorphism. Monazite chemical Th-U-Pb dates from the MG resolve a two-stage garnet growth at 444 ± 7 Ma (M1) and 423 ± 6 Ma (M2). In contrast, monazite dated in the AC defines a single age of 420 ± 4 Ma interpreted as M2 growth. We suggest M2 was coeval with early strike-slip motion along the Billefjorden Fault Zone, whereas M1 reflects initial tectonic burial of the studied units. The similarity in metamorphic history between the both units suggests that the boundary between them is a subordinate thrust fault within the Atomfjella thrust stack rather than a major boundary separating the Nordaustlandet and West Ny-Friesland terranes. The MG should be included within the West Ny-Friesland terrane and the tectonic boundary with the Nordaustlandet terrane is likely the Eolussletta Shear Zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".