MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353057569 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00476

Understanding the Evolution of the Structure and Electrical Properties during Crystallization of Li<sub>1.5</sub>Al<sub>0.5</sub>Ge<sub>1.5</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> and Li<sub>1.5</sub>Sc<sub>0.17</sub>Al<sub>0.33</sub>Ge<sub>1.5</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> NASICON -Type Glass Ceramics

2023· article· en· W4353057569 on OpenAlexaff
Jeferson Almeida Dias, Silvia H. Santagneli, Ana Cândida Martins Rodrigues, Naiza Vilas Bôas, Younès Messaddeq

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsCrystallizationMaterials scienceScandiumFast ion conductorRaman spectroscopyDifferential scanning calorimetryIonic conductivityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Dielectric spectroscopyChemical engineeringChemistryElectrolytePhysical chemistryThermodynamicsMetallurgyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the effects of crystallization advance on the material structure and electrical properties of lithium-ion Na + super ionic conductor (NASICON) glass ceramics were investigated. Glasses with Li 1.5 Al 0.5 Ge 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 and Li 1.5 Sc 0.17 Al 0.33 Ge 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 compositions were crystallized in controlled conditions to obtain gradual increment of the volume crystallized fraction. The glass-to-crystal transformation was then monitored by differential scanning calorimetry analysis (DSC), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MAS NMR), and electron microscopy, along with chemical analyses. Finally, the electrical properties of the specimens were evaluated by impedance spectroscopy to observe the changes in electrical properties according to the crystallization advance. Results revealed that glasses containing scandium are more stable against crystallization than their neat counterparts. Crystallization led to the formation of single-phase NASICON glass ceramics. Scandium induced a lattice expansion of the NASICON structure. Furthermore, crystallization induces remarkable structural changes in the materials as a whole, either in local order or in medium to long order. No important increase in conductivity was observed in earlier stages of crystallization. After the percolation of crystals, conductivity increases sharply and the remaining glassy phase has little impact on the total conductivity of the material. Scandium expands the rhombohedral structure but increases the glass stability and reduces the sizes of crystals for the fully crystallized glass ceramics. Glass ceramics with larger grains are more propitious for conductivity than the more refined ones. Therefore, this paper offers key information about the understanding of NASICON crystallization and its structural evolution, providing important insights into the crystallization of these electrolytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207