MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4353083184 · doi:10.5430/jct.v12n2p30

Higher Education as a Pedagogical System

2023· article· en· W4353083184 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zoriana Udych, І. М. Nestaiko, Nadiia Senovska, Anna Dynovych, Serhii Khrapatyi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor Market and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigher educationCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)AbstractionGlobalizationMathematics educationProcess (computing)SociologyPedagogyPolitical scienceComputer sciencePsychologyEpistemologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The processes of globalization and integration in modern conditions have significantly intensified. They have a significant impact on the sphere of education, causing the intensification of the processes of reforming higher education as a single integrated pedagogical system. These trends lead to the need to reformat the purpose, content, methods, means, and forms of education in higher education based on innovation, interaction, and mutual coherence. The article aims to substantiate the theoretical foundations and applied aspects of the study of higher education as a pedagogical system. The methodological basis of the study consists of general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge and fundamental research, namely: system analysis, synthesis, scientific abstraction, analogies, comparisons, comparative analysis, graphical, tabular, generalization, and systematization. The obtained results of the study helped to establish that the development and functioning of higher education as a pedagogical system in modern conditions of uncertainty and danger is subject to significant destabilizing factors and factors of the external and internal environment, among the most significant of which are the COVID-19 pandemic and the transition of higher education institutions to distance learning. The need for higher education to introduce innovative means of teaching and providing educational services, as well as the formation of conceptual foundations for the strategic development of higher education as a pedagogical system has been revealed. The structural and logical scheme of functioning of higher education as a pedagogical system is proposed, which provides for close interaction of the subjects of the educational process in higher education within the structural and functional components of the pedagogical system. The proposal to strengthen the strategic management of higher education as a pedagogical system has been presented and its main stages have been defined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and TeachingSame topicLabor Market and EducationFrench-language works237,207