Clinical presentation and outcome of patients with enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the lung: A pooled analysis of published cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the lung (lung-ETAC, former pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma, PEAC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which shares morphological and immunohistochemical features with lung and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Few data are available on patient prognosis, possible prognostic factors and systemic approach to metastatic disease. We performed a pooled analysis and a systematic review of published lung-ETAC, along with an additional case description. Thirty-one eligible publications were identified, providing data from 126 patients. In the 127 patients overall analyzed, median overall survival (OS) was 56.0 (range 36.7-75.3) months in early-stage patients and 14.0 (range 4.5-23.5) months in those with advanced/metastatic disease. Median disease-free survival (DFS) after radical surgery was 24 (range 22.6-35.1) months. Smoking status (HR 4.304, 95% CI: 1.261-14.693, p = 0.020) and node involvement (HR 1.853, 95% CI: 1.179-2.911, p = 0.007) were the negative independent prognostic factors at multivariate analysis. As regards systemic therapies for advanced cases, no firm conclusions were drawn about the efficacy of lung cancer-oriented chemotherapy regimens as opposed to colon cancer-oriented ones. Molecular analysis of lung-ETAC revealed a relatively high mutational rate, with alterations in several druggable molecular pathways, KRAS and NRAS (31%) were the most frequently mutated oncogenes, followed by ROS1 (15%), RET (13%), BRAF (11%), EGFR (8%) and ALK (6%). Moreover, 3 (15%) out of 20 cases showed DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). In conclusion, advanced lung-ETAC patients appeared to have a better prognosis compared to other subtypes of NSCLC. Moreover, the mutational rate and microsatellite instability found in lung-ETACs suggest that a significant proportion of these patients could benefit from target therapies and immunotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".