Molecular evolutionary model based on phylogenetic and mutation analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein sequences from Asian countries: A phylogenomic approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lethal pathogenic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has caused the COVID-19 pandemic, posing serious risks to people. The clove-like spike (S) protein that distinguishes coronaviruses from other viruses is important for viral pathogenicity, evolution, and transmission. The investigation of the unique structural mutations of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein among 34 Asian countries, as well as the resulting phylogenetic relationship, provided critical information in understanding the pathogenesis. This can be utilized for the discovery of possible treatments and vaccine development. The current study analyzed and depicted phylogenetic and evolutionary models useful for understanding SARS-CoV-2 human-human transmission dynamics in Asian regions with shared land borders. Further, integrated bioinformatics analysis was performed to predict the pathogenic potential and stability of 53 mutational positions among 34 coronavirus strains. Mutations at positions N969K, D614G and S884F have deleterious effects on protein function. These findings are crucial because the Asian mutations could potentially provide a vaccine candidate with co-protection against all SARS-CoV-2 strains. This region is vulnerable because of the high population density and the volume of domestic and international travel for business and tourism. These discoveries would also aid in the development of plans for governments and the general populace to implement all required biocontainment protocols common to all countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".