Venous dysfunction in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathies: Results from the “HCM-Vein” pilot study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (HCM) can be complicated by left ventricular outflow-tract obstruction (LVOTO) responsible for disabling exercise symptoms, a phenomenon influenced by hemodynamic factors including venous return. We aimed to evaluate venous dysfunction in obstructive HCM patients compared to healthy controls, and to investigate the relationship between venous dysfunction parameters and LVOTO in HCM. This is a clinical, monocentric, prospective, pilot study, in a tertiary care center. We investigated venous function using venous air plethysmography, and endothelial function. Among the 30 symptomatic obstructive HCM patients, 30% (n = 9) presented abnormal venous residual volume fraction (RVFv) which translates in elevated ambulatory venous pressure vs. 0% in the 10 healthy controls (p < 0.05). Comparing obstructive HCM patients with abnormal RVFv (n = 9) to other obstructive HCM patients with normal RVFv (n = 21), there were no significant differences in terms of age, sex (67% male), and classical echocardiographic parameters both at rest and during exercise, except for left ventricular end-diastolic volume index which was significantly lower in the group with abnormal RVFv compared to the other HCM patients (40.1 ± 9.0 ml/m2 vs. 50.2 ± 10.6 ml/m2, p = 0.01). Fifty six percent of obstructive HCM patients with abnormal RVFv had an absolute increase in Willebrand factor (vs. 26% of other obstructive HCM patients, p < 0.05). In this pilot monocentric study, venous insufficiency was observed in about 30% of symptomatic obstructive HCM patients. Patients with venous insufficiency had more frequently a smaller LV cavity volume. Due to the small sample size, this study is only hypothesis-generating, and further investigations are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".