MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360592203 · doi:10.5114/pja.2023.125770

D-dimer elevation during tranexamic acid therapyand the debate on the therapeutic approach in hereditaryangioedema type I

2023· article· en· W4360592203 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cansu Özdemiral, Deniz Çağdaş

Bibliographic record

VenueAlergologia Polska - Polish Journal of Allergology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranexamic acidMedicineHereditary angioedemaTherapeutic effectDermatologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hereditary angioedema type 1 (HAE-1) is the most prevalent HAE type, and it results from decreased antigenic C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) levels or function.Bradykinin-mediated angioedema in the face, trunk, extremities, genitalia, gastrointestinal tract, and upper airway are the symptoms of this rare and potentially fatal disease.PD-C1-INH concentrates, recombinant C1-INH, tranexamic acid (TXA), danazol, icatibant, ecallantide, and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) may be used for treatment.The focus of this article is to point out D-dimer elevation during TXA use.We detected d-dimer elevation incidentally in 2 patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) type 1 during tranexamic acid (TXA) therapy, in whom elevations were normalized a week after suspended TXA.However, the TXA treatment is expected to decrease D-dimer levels in surgery and hyperfibrinolysis.On the other hand, although using TXA in long-term prophylaxis in HAE treatment is not recommended, we observed that 2 patients had significant reduction of their attack frequency for over a year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.055
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlergologia Polska - Polish Journal of AllergologySame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207