Engaging patients in anesthesiology research: a rewarding frontier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patient-oriented research in anesthesiologyPatient-oriented research is an emerging approach that engages patients, clinicians, and researchers to ensure focus on patient-identified priorities. 1 From a clinical perspective, involving patients in medical decisions is required by law and professional code (i.e., informed consent).Informed consent requires evidence that is pertinent to the decision at hand, but also information that is deemed relevant by the decision maker (the patient).Despite the importance of research in providing evidence to inform such clinical decisions, engaging patients in clinical research is not frequently done, is often suboptimal, and is not required by regulations and good practice.The failure to engage patients in clinical research has led to large swathes of research that neither addresses
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.091 | 0.173 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.030 | 0.021 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.029 |
| Research integrity | 0.019 | 0.032 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".