MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Information-Directed Tree-Search Algorithm for RIS Phase Optimization in Massive MIMO

2023· article· en· W4360605356 on OpenAlexaff
Imran Ahmed, Hamid R. Sadjadpour, Shahram Yousefi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCramér–Rao boundAlgorithmComputer scienceMIMOMean squared errorTree traversalMetric (unit)Upper and lower boundsTree (set theory)PruningMathematicsTelecommunicationsEstimation theoryChannel (broadcasting)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel Information-Directed Branch-and-Prune (IDBP) algorithm to optimize the discrete phase settings of a passive Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS) to improve the blocked line-of-sight (LOS) link performance in the Massive Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MaMIMO) wireless networks. The MaMIMO transceivers are assumed to be equipped with a hybrid precoder, combiner, and low-resolution analog-to-digital converters (ADCs). Mean Squared Error (MSE) of the received and combined symbol at the receiver is used as the performance metric. We derive the expression for the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) of the MSE as a function of the RIS phase shift settings for a given hybrid precoder, combiner, and ADC bits. The proposed IDBP algorithm arrives at the RIS phase settings that minimize the CRLB using an information-theoretic measure that define the pruning rules in the tree traversal. Using the proposed algorithm and with an appropriate design of the hybrid precoder and combiner, it can be shown that the MSE achieves the CRLB. We claim theoretical guarantees for near-optimal MSE performance and the throughput for a blocked LOS link with reduced computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207