LBA02-01 BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER ORIGINATING FROM THE TRANSITION VERSUS PERIPHERAL ZONE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023LBA02-01 BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER ORIGINATING FROM THE TRANSITION VERSUS PERIPHERAL ZONE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Shijie Jin, Liyi Wu, and Weigang Yan Shijie JinShijie Jin More articles by this author , Liyi WuLiyi Wu More articles by this author , and Weigang YanWeigang Yan More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003361.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The influence of zonal origin of localized prostate cancer (PC) on biochemical recurrence (BCR) is still controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of published articles to compare BCR of localized PC originating from the transition versus peripheral zone. METHODS: Systematic research of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify all trials on BCR of localized PC originating from transition and peripheral zone. The incidences of BCR were pooled with a fixed or random effect model and reported as Risk Ratio (RR), and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 value. Substantial heterogeneity was defined as an I2 value >50%. Subgroup analysis was performed according to follow-up time, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) score, and whether a multivariate or univariate Cox regression model was used. RESULTS: A total of 16 cohorts with 19,365 patients were included. Overall, PC originating from transition zone was associated with a lower risk of BCR (RR, 0.79, 95%CI; 0.69-0.92, I2, 76.8%). This association was consistent in subgroup analyses of studies with median follow-up time ≥60 months (RR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.48 to 0.88, I2 56.8%), median PSA <10ng/ml (RR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.49 to 0.94, I2 84.4%), median PSA >10ng/ml (RR, 0.91; 95%CI, 0.88 to 0.94, I2 14.8%), NOS score ≥8 (RR, 0.70; 95%CI, 0.62 to 0.80, I2 32.4%), and studies using a multivariate regression model (RR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.48 to 0.69, I2 23%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed a decreased incidence of BCR of localized PC originating from transition zone compared to peripheral zone, especially in studies using a multivariate regression model. Therefore, it was supported that PC originating from transition zone might be a different clinical entity with a significantly lower risk of BCR. Source of Funding: National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding of Peking Union Medical College Hospital [2022-PUMCH-A-063, 2022-PUMCH-B-009] © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1186 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Shijie Jin More articles by this author Liyi Wu More articles by this author Weigang Yan More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.015 | 0.040 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".