MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360613623 · doi:10.18280/rcma.330102

Effect of Alumina Particles on the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Polypropylene Whisker Reinforced Lamination 80:20 Resin Composite

2023· article· fr· W4360613623 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhiskerLaminationComposite materialComposite numberMaterials sciencePolypropyleneWhiskersLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The low cost, relatively high fibre strength, and low density of polypropylene (PP) fibres make them an attractive candidate for reinforcing low-cost composite materials for various applications.The use of particles in fibre-reinforced composite structures usually improves the strength of the basic material.Alumina (Al2O3), with its unique properties, has been used to improve the composite material's properties.It is crucial to determine the appropriate concentration of Al2O3 particles that can be added to Polypropylene whisker/epoxy composites to get the required mechanical and physical properties.In this study lamination 80:20 resin was used as a matrix material to prepare a Polypropylene whisker (3 %wt.) reinforced lamination 80:20 resin (PP/resin) composite.The composite materials were manufactured by hand lay-up method.Different concentrations (1, 3, 5, 7 & 10 wt.%) of alumina (Al2O3) particles, were used to reinforce the composite.The composite materials are prepared with standard sizes according to the tests, the tests include mechanical tests (tensile, impact, and hardness test) and physical tests (water absorption and density).The tests results showed an improvement in tensile strength, elongation, toughness, fracture toughness, hardness and density, while the water absorption diminishes concerning an increase in the concentration of the Al2O3 particles.The tensile strength, elongation, elastic modulus, hardness and density improved from (17 MPa, 1.3%, 1.13GPa, 70 Shore D and 0.93gm/cm 3 ) respectively for neat lamina and reach the maximum value (34.5 MPa, 3.1%, 1.47 GPa, 83 Shore D and 1.01 gm/cm 3 ) respectively at (3%wt.PP and 10%wt.Al2O3), while the toughness and fracture toughness improved from (3.8 KJ/m 2 and 0.06 MPa.m 1/2 ) respectively for neat lamina and reach the maximum value (23.1 KJ/m 2 and 0.19 MPa.m 1/2 ) respectively at (3 %wt.PP and 7% wt.Al2O3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it