Three-Dimensional Spatial Stability Analysis of the Fundão Dam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The failure of the Fundão Dam has been previously studied using two-dimensional approaches. The original investigation findings did not point to mechanisms of slope instability as the causes of the disaster. However, the complex shape of the dam and its concave and convex regions were not considered due to the limitations of the analysis tools employed. This paper presents two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) analyses that are more rigorous and better suited for the Fundão Dam geometry. Slope stability analyses were accomplished using the general limit equilibrium method (GLE). Critical slip surfaces were searched in 2D and 3D across the entire dam face. Drained shear strength parameters led to factors of safety (FS) that would indicate fairly stable conditions, with the lowest FS being 1.744. Values close to 1.0 were obtained considering undrained conditions. The 3D values of FS were very close to the 2D values, but with noticeably higher variations near the concave and convex regions. This leads to the conclusion that the dam shape near the setback region requires closer examination by means of 3D analyses, enabling the identification of critical zones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".