Distinctive root system adaptation of ploidy wheats to water stress: A cue to yield enhancement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Given the worldwide effort to improve crop drought resistance, it is crucial to understand the mechanisms of root system adaptation of ploidy wheat to water‐deficient environments. A meta‐analysis was performed to examine the changes in root system mechanisms under drought conditions. Data used in the analysis were drawn from 192 papers, taking into account wheat ploidy levels as well as pot and field studies. The results illustrated that water stress reduced grain yield and aboveground biomass to a greater extent in diploid and tetraploid compared with hexaploid genotypes. In contrast, drought reduced root biomass, root surface area and root volume more in hexaploid than in diploid and tetraploid wheat. Under water‐limited conditions, diploid and tetraploid genotypes exhibited greater root biomass and root length densities in the topsoil. Hexaploid genotypes greatly reduced root biomass and root length density in the topsoil and maintained higher root biomass and root length density in subsoil. These genotypes also showed smaller root diameter and xylem centre vessel diameter under drought conditions. The analysis revealed that grain yield was negatively correlated with topsoil root biomass and root length density, root volume, root diameter and xylem centre vessel, but positively correlated with subsoil root mass, root length density and root vigour. The study demonstrated that domestication and selection pressures of ploidy wheat have altered wheat root system traits while improving grain yield. Greater root mass and root length densities in the subsoil facilitate access to soil moisture from deep layers, contributing to high yields in drought environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".