MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360618275 · doi:10.5430/jct.v12n2p83

The Role of Competencies in the Educational Process of Training Future Specialists in the “Labour Training and Technologies” Speciality

2023· article· en· W4360618275 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Олексій Дебре, Nadiia Vakulenko, Anastasiia Savchenko, L. L. Lysenko, Marianna Kondor, Alla Kis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Social Development in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetence (human resources)SpecialtyUkrainianPerceptionPsychologyProcess (computing)PedagogyMedical educationMedicineComputer scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From a theoretical point of view, Ukrainian education for teachers of the "Labour training and technologies" specialty is in the process of searching for effective methods that would ensure the future education of schoolchildren through the transfer of relevant competencies, which are regulated by education standards. Such competencies have been analyzed in the present research. In addition, the theoretical developments of both domestic and foreign teachers, in particular, of Scandinavian countries, are taken into account in the formation of labor education for schoolchildren. The present research pays particular attention to the newest standpoint in the assessment of the perception of competencies and their understanding by students of the "Labour Training and Technologies" specialty. The academic paper represents the results of acquiring the competencies by students of the "Labour training and technologies" specialty at the Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University named after Volodymyr Vynnychenko. The main revealed regularities indicate the fact that students of the corresponding specialty quite superficially understand the role and significance of mastering the competencies defined by the standard of Ukrainian education. A characteristic feature of acquiring the competencies by students is their awareness of civic and social competencies. Competencies in the field of natural sciences, engineering and technology, and innovation are perceived by them to a lower rank. The research has identified the most painful problems regarding competencies that are not perceived by students, namely: creative activity, information, a communication component, and culture. Insufficient attention is paid to mathematical competence, financial literacy, and the environmental component. The results of the present research have indicated the need for additional discussions on the methods of perception of competencies by students to improve the educational process and curricula towards increasing learning efficiency. The research results obtained create opportunities for a more flexible expansion of applying existing digital systems in the formation of competencies according to educational standards and the implementation of a motivational approach in increasing the level of self-development of students and teachers of the "Labour Training and Technologies" specialty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and TeachingSame topicEducation and Social Development in UkraineFrench-language works237,207