MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360764590 · doi:10.1109/icir55739.2022.00027

Virtualized Experiential Learning Platform (VELP) for Smart Grids and Operational Technology Cybersecurity

2022· article· en· W4360764590 on OpenAlexaff
Moein Manbachi, Mona Hammami

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtualizationCloud computingComputer scienceIndustry 4.0Experiential learningCyberspaceComputer securityEngineering managementEngineeringThe InternetWorld Wide WebEmbedded systemOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent and the rapid expansion of Industry 4.0 solutions and technologies such as IoT, Artificial Intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and digital twinning, is causing industrial companies, utilities, and other organizations to either retrain their workforce or hire experts from other industries who have the knowledge or hands-on experience working with such technologies. With the emergence of remote working routines, providing such hands-on training programs becomes difficult. As such, BCIT's Smart Microgrid Applied Research Team has developed an advanced Virtualized Experiential Learning Platform (VELP) with the support of the Future Skills Centre and its industry partner to provide trainees from industry and academia with hands-on experience in the fields of smart grids, substation automation systems and Operational Technology (OT) cybersecurity utilizing virtualization technologies such as digital twins, AI, and cloud apps. This paper aims to introduce VELP, its features, and functionalities, and explain how monitoring and control layers can be migrated into cyberspace. Moreover, this paper proposes a reliable communication network and a cybersecure topology that can be utilized in similar virtualization platforms. The results of this paper show that such technologies can be applied to other digital experiential learning programs where reliable and secure remote access to physical assets is essential to support relevant experiential learning pedagogical models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207