Effect of inclusion of hatchery discarded infertile egg meal with shell on In vitro digestibility of puppy food
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of inclusion of infertile egg meal with shell obtained from the hatchery on in vitro digestibility of commercial puppy food. The infertile egg meal obtained from the GADVASU hatchery was first broken in a tray along with shell and dried in a hot air oven at 65°C for 48 hours and then grinded to form infertile egg meal with shell (IEMS). The IEMS was subsequently analysed for microbiological examination and in vitro digestibility of puppy food at graded inclusion level of 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10%. The chemical analysis of the IEMS revealed that the DM, CP, EE, CF, TA, AIA, Ca and P was 35.5, 33.2, 26.5, 0.1, 20.5, 0.1, 9.1 and 1.13 %,respectively. The microbiological examination revealed that IEMS samples were negative for Salmonella and E. coli bacteria, while the total viable count was 2060 CFU at 1:10 dilution which subsequently become nil in further dilution and thus the bacterial contamination of IEMS was negligible. Results revealed that the in vitro digestibility of dry matter was significantly (P<0.05) highest in commercial puppy food (87.3 %) and 2.50 % level of IEMS (86.1%) and was significantly (P<0.05) lowest at 10% level of IEMS (82.94%). The in vitro organic matter digestibility was significantly (P<0.05) higher in commercial puppy food (88.4%) and 2.5% IEMS level (87.4%) as compared to 7.5 % (84.8%) and 10 % (84.0%) level of inclusion of IEMS however, it was comparable with 5% level of IEMS inclusion. The ether extract digestibility was significantly (P<0.05) highest in 2.5% level of IEMS (97.0%) and significantly (P<0.05) lowest in commercial puppy feed (91.9%). The crude protein digestibility was significantly (P<0.05) higher in the commercial puppy food, 2.5 %, 5 % and 7.5 % level of IEMS as compared to 10% level of IEMS. It was concluded that IEMS is a good source of alternative protein and can be included at 2.5 and 5 % level in the diet of Labrador puppy food.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".