MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360817435 · doi:10.34067/kid.0000000000000092

Characteristics and Distribution of Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Compared with the General Population: A Meta-Analysis

2023· review· en· W4360817435 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Julien Haemmerli, Sandrine Morel, Marc Georges, Fadi Haidar, Fouad T. Chebib, Akio Morita, Kazuhiko Nozaki, Teiji Tominaga, Anatoliy V. Bervitskiy, Jamil Rzaev, Karl Schaller, Philippe Bijlenga

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney360 · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIISociété Française de RadiologieNational Institutes of HealthSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean CommissionNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular CenterHelsingin ja Uudenmaan SairaanhoitopiiriNational Science FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchPKD FoundationJapan Brain Foundation
KeywordsAutosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseaseMedicinePopulationInternal medicineCardiologyRadiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points IAs location distribution in patients with ADPKD differ from the ones in non-ADPKD patients IAs in patients with ADPKD are more commonly located in the anterior circulation and in large caliber arteries Because of IA multiplicity and singular IA distribution, patients with ADPKD represent a special population who need to be closely followed Background Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common genetic condition associated with intracranial aneurysms (IAs). The associated pathophysiology remains unknown, but an association with wall shear stress is suspected. Cerebral arterial location is the principal factor influencing IA natural history. This study aims to compare IA location-specific distribution between ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients. Methods The ADPKD group comprised data from a systematic review of the literature (2016–2020, N =7) and three cohorts: integrated biomedical informatics for the management of cerebral aneurysms, Novosibirsk, and Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Study. The non-ADPKD group was formed from the integrated biomedical informatics for the management of cerebral aneurysms, Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Study, International Stroke Genetics Consortium, and the Finnish cohort from the literature. Patients and IAs characteristics were compared between ADPKD and non-ADPKD groups, and a meta-analysis for IA locations was performed. Results A total of 1184 IAs from patients with ADPKD were compared with 21,040 IAs from non-ADPKD patients. In total, 78.6% of patients with ADPKD had hypertension versus 39.2% of non-ADPKD patients. A total of 32.4% of patients with ADPKD were smokers versus 31.5% of non-ADPKD patients. In total, 30.1% of patients with ADPKD had a positive family history for IA versus 15.8% of the non-ADPKD patients. Patients with ADPKD showed a higher rate of IA multiplicity (33.2% versus 23.1%). IAs from patients with ADPKD showed a significant predominance across the internal carotid and middle cerebral arteries. Posterior communicating IAs were more frequently found in the non-ADPKD group. The meta-analysis confirmed a predominance of IAs in the patients with ADPKD across large caliber arteries (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: internal carotid artery: 1.90 [1.10 to 3.29]; middle cerebral artery: 1.18 [1.02–1.36]). Small diameter arteries, such as the posterior communicating, were observed more in non-ADPKD patients (0.21 [0.11–0.88]). Conclusion This analysis shows that IAs diagnosed in patients with ADPKD are more often localized in large caliber arteries from the anterior circulation in comparison with IAs in non-ADPKD patients. It shows that primary cilia driven wall shear stress vessel remodeling to be more critical in cerebral anterior circulation large caliber arteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.017
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney360Same topicGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesFrench-language works237,207