Récits de vie de jeunes immigrants et immigrantes diplômés des écoles de langue française à Toronto et Edmonton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article proposé porte sur les trajectoires de vie de deux jeunes hommes, Benjamin et Pierre, issus de l’immigration qui vivent dans les communautés francophones de Toronto et d’Edmonton. Grâce au récit de vie, nous examinons de près les processus à l’œuvre dans leur expérience d’intégration scolaire et sociale. Nous partons du principe que l’intégration est un processus social dynamique, inscrit dans le long terme, multidimensionnel et non linéaire. Ce regard porté à la notion d’intégration reconnait que ce processus se déroule sur un continuum intégrant l’expérience pré et post-migratoire de la personne immigrée. Comment Benjamin et Pierre décrivent-ils leur expérience d’immigration ? Comment se représentent-ils leur intégration tant scolaire que sociale au moment de leur arrivée ? C’est à travers le discours de ces jeunes que nous examinons ces questions. Notre analyse portera notamment sur les notions de motilité et d’altérité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".