Periodic Navier Stokes Equations for a 3D Incompressible Fluid with Liutex Vortex Identification Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations (NSEs) are on the list of Millennium Problems, to prove their existence and uniqueness of solutions. The NSEs can be formulated in a periodic 3D domain, where they are termed the Periodic Navier Stokes (PNS) Equations, and can be treated on a subspace spanning a 3-dimensional torus, or T3. Treating the PNS Equations in T3-space, this article demonstrates that a decaying of turbulence occurs in the 3D case for the z component of velocity when non-smooth initial conditions are considered for x, y components of velocity and that ‘vorticity’ sheets in the small scales of 3D turbulence dominate the flow to the extent that non-smooth temporal solutions exist for the z velocity for smooth initial data for the x, y components of velocity. Unlike the Navier-Stokes equations, which have no anti-symmetric vorticity tensor, there are new governing equations which have vorticity tensor and can be decomposed into a rotational part(Liutex), antisymmetric shear and compression and stretching. It is shown that under these recent findings, that there is a strong correlation between vorticity and vorticies for (PNS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".