MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4360878130 · doi:10.18280/rcma.330109

Experiments on Mechanical Properties of Bio-Composite Produced from the Shell of Argan Nuts

2023· article· fr· W4360878130 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fouad Babty, Soukaina Fekkar, A. Derouiche, Soumia Mordane, A. El Assyry, Abdelilah Hachim

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicAgricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShell (structure)Composite numberMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The argan tree (Argania Spinosa) grows mainly in Morocco.This forest species, also called iron tree, covers about 830000 ha of Moroccan territory.Virtues of this argan oil are multiple: uses for cooking, medicines, or cosmetics.The objective of this work is the valorization of the argan tree, and especially in its shell, which remains poorly exploited and which is sold by the premises at low prices for use as a fuel in the Moorish baths and bakeries.Argan shell is the reinforcement of this bio-composite.For this, the shell is ground, sieved and separated into five different diameters d.Then, the preparations of the three ranges, each of which is composed of proportions (20%, 60%, 20%) of increasing diameter of particles.Each particle range is used as reinforcement in a matrix of urea formaldehyde and water as a non-polluting solvent.Using a traction machine, the Young module and the breaking stress of the three biomaterial ranges were determined.Our results show that the Young module of first range (R1) remains superior to that of other two ranges and also has a high breaking voltage.Then the bending measurements were made by the three-point machine MTS EM Flexion.Our results show that the R1 has a greater bending stress than the other two ranges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés→Same topicAgricultural Engineering and Mechanization→French-language works237,207→