MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360895798 · doi:10.1299/jsmemecj.2022.s401-02

Open-innovative developments of precision die making technology and on-site capabilities

2022· article· en· W4360895798 on OpenAlexaff
Takao Itō

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress Japan · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse academic and cultural studies
Canadian institutionsMD Precision (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition (finance)Open innovationCore (optical fiber)BusinessProduction (economics)Sustainable developmentIndustrial organizationManufacturing engineeringEngineeringMarketingTelecommunicationsEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Japanese manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have long supported the backbone of the Japanese economy based on their superior technologies and on-site capabilities; however, they are currently at a major crossroads in today's severe and rapidly changing environment. One of Japanese SMEs, Nissin Precision Machines (Nissin), with precision die making technology at its core, is attempting to bring innovation to its manufacturing site to combat the challenges of the current economic and business climates and to position itself for the long-term. Nissin has introduced its innovation strategies to achieve autonomous and sustainable development to withstand any environmental changes. To name a few examples: Nissin engages in open and collaborative innovation activities with its rival die manufacturers along with notable academic institutions, collaborative productions with designers that have incorporated design concepts into its works, and deliberately strengthens production management through the bottom-up approach enhanced by its front-line members and utilization of DX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress JapanSame topicDiverse academic and cultural studiesFrench-language works237,207