Folate Levels in Third Trimester of Pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: To determine the folate levels in third trimester of pregnancy Study design: Cross-sectional study Place and duration: Conducted at post graduate medical institute, Lahore. Duration was 6 months from June 2022 to December 2022. Methods: Ninety anemic females were selected from the antenatal clinics of different hospitals of Lahore. These incorporated equal numbers of primigravidae and multigravidae and all of them were in the third trimester of pregnancy. They had not taken any hematinic supplements during the pregnancy. Results: Folate deficiency was seen in 44.4% of the primigravidae with peripheral blood macrocytosis and bone marrow megaloblastosis. An association exists between the clinical anemia and the peripheral blood and bone marrow findings with those of serum and red cell folate levels. Conclusion: Folic acid should be included as a routine in hematinic supplements prescribed for pregnant females to protect them from anemia and its consequent complications. Key words: Folate, gestation, trimester, megaloblastic anemia, macocytosis, bone marrow
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".