MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360953589 · doi:10.53967/cje-rce.6041

Book Review: A Research Agenda for Graduate Education

2023· article· en· W4360953589 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Vander Tavares

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraduate educationSociologyPolitical sciencePedagogyEngineering ethicsMathematics educationLibrary sciencePsychologyComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brian S. Mitchell defines the state of the art of research on graduate education and identifies some of the key changes, needs, and issues facing graduate education and research in the 21 st century.Mitchell explains that the impetus for this book stemmed from the need to rethink graduate education through "more timely data, longitudinal studies across a wider array of institution types, and theoretically sound and robust models on more specific research questions that consider multiple factors and their interactions" (p.xvii).Indeed, Mitchell's central message in the book is that efforts to improve, innovate, and maintain excellence in graduate education are not only urgently needed, but also dependant on sound evidence.In addition to introductory and concluding chapters, this book consists of three chapters that focus on distinct facets of graduate education research: The theoretical nature of teaching and learning at the graduate level, the implementation of pedagogical practices, and the development and assessment of graduate education.While this book may be of interest to a wide audience of researchers, educators, and administrators Book Review: Tavares xvi Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation 46:1 (2023) www.cje-rce.caworking in graduate education, the core chapters tackle each of the three facets rather discretely, thereby delineating more fixed boundaries between these groups of readers, and Mitchell presents a convincing argument for organising the book in such a way.In the Introduction, Mitchell builds a concise, yet thorough context for his research agenda.The topics within the three core chapters are structured sequentiallythat is, in addition to being all thematically interconnected, they build upon one another in a consecutive, logical manner.By designing the chapters in such a style, Mitchell

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.013
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207