MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360962701 · doi:10.26443/msurj.v18i1.193

Rho GTPase regulatory proteins contribute to podocyte morphology and function

2023· article· en· W4360962701 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily Foxman, Sajida Ibrahim, Tomoko Takano

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Science Undergraduate Research Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
FundersMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
KeywordsRHOAGuanine nucleotide exchange factorRAC1Cell biologyGTPaseADP ribosylation factorActin cytoskeletonActinSmall GTPasePodocyteBiologyChemistryCytoskeletonBiochemistrySignal transductionGeneticsCellProteinuriaKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Podocytes are a critical cellular component of the glomerular filtration barrier, whose strict permselectivity prohibits the passage of large proteins and charged species into the urine. Phenotypic variability or injury of these highly specialized cells can lead to proteinuria and has been linked with altered activity of Rho GTPases, which are strongly associated with the actin cytoskeleton. Notable regulators of these intracellular molecular switches are called guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), and guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs). In this study, the roles of several GEFs in podocyte morphology and activity were investigated, including ECT2, ARHGEF2, ARHGEF26, and ARHGEF40. Results from RhoA and Rac1 G-LISA Activation Assays indicated that the absence of ARHGEF40 impairs epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated RhoA and Rac1 activation, whereas knockout of ARHGEF2 and ARHGEF26 may selectively diminish RhoA activation. Furthermore, filopodia formation was hindered for the ARHGEF40 knockout. There are a number of additional investigations underway to understand Rho GTPase regulatory proteins, including the elimination of new sets of GEFs and GAPs in vivo. It is hopeful that these studies can provide insights into potential novel therapeutic strategies for proteinuria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Science Undergraduate Research JournalSame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207