Koudougou Station TEC’s Variability Seasonal Anomalies Analysis During Fluctuating Events Over Solar Cycle 24
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper deals with the analysis of anomalies on variations of total electron content (TEC) during fluctuating geomagnetic events through solar cycle 24 at Koudougou station (lat 12°15'N; long:-2°20'E). Study of anomalies was done by comparing the variations of TEC during solstice and equinox seasons and variations of TEC at equinoxes to those at solstices. Comparison was made taking into account solar cycle phases and seasons influences. Equinoctial asymmetry is recorded at ascending and maximum phases. Winter anomaly is observed all night (0000 LT-04 00 LT and 2000 LT-2300 LT) at solar maximum and at all times during the ascending phase, except around 0600 LT and 1800 LT. Semi-annual asymmetry is observed during all phases of solar cycle 24 during fluctuating events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".