MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360982855 · doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1138599

Impact of muscular symptoms and/or pain on disease characteristics, disability, and quality of life in adult patients with hypophosphatasia: A cross-sectional analysis from the Global HPP Registry

2023· article· en· W4360982855 on OpenAlex
Kathryn Dahir, Priya S. Kishnani, Gabriel Ángel Martos‐Moreno, Agnès Linglart, Anna Petryk, Cheryl R. Greenberg, Samantha E. Martel, Keiichi Ozono, Wolfgang Högler, Lothar Seefried

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Endocrinology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersAlexion PharmaceuticalsAstraZeneca
KeywordsMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)HypophosphatasiaPhysical therapyCross-sectional studyInternal medicineSkeletal musclePathologyAlkaline phosphatase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Hypophosphatasia (HPP) manifests in adults as fractures/pseudofractures, pain, muscle weakness, and other functional impairments. Better phenotypic disease characterization is needed to help recognize disability and treat patients with HPP. Methods Baseline/pretreatment demographic, clinical characteristic, and patient-reported disability/health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) data from adults (≥18 y) in the Global HPP Registry (NCT02306720) were stratified by presence of overt skeletal manifestations (skeletal group) versus muscular/pain manifestations without skeletal manifestations (muscular/pain group) and summarized descriptively. Disability was measured using the Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and HRQoL using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2). Results Of 468 adults, 300 were classified into the skeletal group and 73 into the muscular/pain group. The skeletal group had a higher median age at baseline (50.1 vs 44.4 y; P =0.047) but a lower median age at first HPP manifestation (12.3 vs 22.1 y; P =0.0473), with more signs and symptoms (median, 4 vs 3; P <0.0001) and involved body systems (median, 3 vs 2; P <0.0001) than the muscular/pain group. More patients in the skeletal group required any use of mobility aids (22.6% vs 3.5%, respectively; P =0.001). Six-Minute Walk test distances walked were similar between groups. SF-36v2 and HAQ-DI scores were similar between groups for physical component summary (n=238; mean [SD]: 40.2 [11.0] vs 43.6 [11.2]; P =0.056), mental component summary (n=238; mean [SD]: 43.6 [11.3] vs 43.8 [11.8]; P =0.902), and HAQ-DI (n=239; median [minimum, maximum]: 0.4 [0.0, 2.7] vs 0.3 [0.0, 2.1]; P =0.22). Conclusion Adults with HPP experience similar QoL impairment regardless of skeletal involvement. Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02306720 and https://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=47907 , identifier NCT02306720; EUPAS13514.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it