MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360982889 · doi:10.1080/01924788.2023.2193786

Cognitive Functioning, Dependency, and Quality of Life Among Older Adults

2023· article· en· W4360982889 on OpenAlex
Khadeeja Munawar, Zeynep Umran Fadzil, Fahad Riaz Choudhry, Rukhsana Kausar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueActivities Adaptation & Aging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDependency (UML)CognitionQuality of life (healthcare)GerontologyPsychologyPoison controlMedicineMedical emergencyComputer sciencePsychiatryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The determinants of QoL need serious deliberation in national as well as international healthcare guidelines as few studies have assessed the QoL of older individuals across cultures and countries. The current cross-sectional study aimed to examine the relationships between cognitive functioning and level of dependency with quality of life (QoL) and the moderating effects of gender and housing type on these relationships among older adults in Pakistan. A total of 274 respondents (own homes = 153; care homes = 121; Mage = 68.75 years, SD = 5.78 years) participated in this study. Cognitive functioning was assessed through Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), while level of dependency was assessed through Incapacity Status Scale (ISS). As for the measurement of QoL, World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument (Urdu version) was adopted. The results of Pearson product-moment correlation revealed the significant relationships of the constructs of interest. Cognitive functioning significantly predicted social QoL for males only but did not significantly predict the overall QoL and its four domains (i.e. physical, psychological, social relationship, and environmental health domains), regardless of housing type (i.e. own homes versus care homes). Meanwhile, the results of regression analysis demonstrated the significance of level of dependency in predicting the overall QoL and its four domains for both male and female respondents. As for those living in their own homes, the level of dependency significantly predicted their overall QoL, as well as physical and environmental QoL. For the older adults living in care homes, cognitive functioning predicted only the social QoL for males, but did not predict the overall QoL or its domains for older individuals in care homes or own homes. Based on these findings, this study demonstrated the significance of cognitive functioning, level of dependency, gender, and housing-type care homes as determinants of QoL among older adults. The study findings have implications for policymakers, practitioners, and public health specialists to cautiously create content that will enhance the older individuals’ QoL. Findings can contribute to designing interventions to motivate and preserve functional mobility in older individuals, and the generate community-based programs to enhance or uphold physical activity in the older individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it