MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4360998392 · doi:10.1080/16583655.2023.2190731

Impact of natural melanin doping on the structural, optical and dielectric characteristics of the PVP/CMC blend

2023· article· en· W4360998392 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. M. El‐naggar, Zein K. Heiba, A. M. Kamal, Khalid E. Alzahrani, Omar H. Abd‐Elkader, Mohamed Bakr Mohamed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Taibah University for Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeanship of Scientific Research, King Saud UniversityKing Saud UniversityKing's University College
KeywordsMaterials scienceCarboxymethyl celluloseDopingDielectricMiscibilityMelaninDielectric lossScanning electron microscopeAmorphous solidPolymer blendBand gapHydroxypropyl celluloseChemical engineeringPolymerAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialChemistryOrganic chemistryOptoelectronicsCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Undoped and doped polyvinyl pyrrolidone/ carboxymethyl cellulose (PVP/CMC: 50/50%) blended polymers with melanin were formed.X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed the amorphous nature of all blends.Scanning electron microscopy results confirmed the smooth and homogeneous surface of the undoped and doped PVP/CMC blend with melanin.The optical parameters and fluorescence spectra of the PVP/CMC blend were investigated as functions of melanin content.The direct optical band gap (E g ) for the used melanin is 2.86 eV.The direct and indirect E g values for the PVP/CMC blend are 5.1 and (4.9, 3.2) eV, respectively.The direct and indirect E g values were reduced to (4.5, 3.23) and (2.2, 1.33) eV as the amount of melanin became 3 wt % in the doped blend.The effect of melanin doping on the dielectric constant, dielectric loss, AC conductivity, complex impedance, Nyquist plot of the complex impedance, and electric modulus of the PVP/CMC blend was also studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Taibah University for ScienceSame topicPolymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and IrradiationFrench-language works237,207