Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and long-term risk of maternal stroke—a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with a long-term risk for cardiovascular disease among parous patients later in life. However, relatively little is known about whether hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with an increased risk for ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke in later life. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the available literature on the association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the long-term risk for maternal stroke. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched from inception to December 19, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were only included if the following criteria were met: case-control or cohort studies that were conducted with human participants, were available in English, and that measured the exposure of a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, chronic hypertension, or superimposed preeclampsia) and the outcome of maternal ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke. METHODS: Three reviewers extracted the data and appraised the study quality following the Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: The primary outcome was any stroke (undifferentiated) and secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under identifier CRD42021254660. Of 24 studies included (10,632,808 study participants), 8 studies examined more than 1 outcome of interest. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were significantly associated with any stroke (adjusted risk ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.10). Preeclampsia was significantly associated with any stroke (adjusted risk ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-1.97), ischemic stroke (adjusted risk ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-2.06), and hemorrhagic stroke (adjusted risk ratio, 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 2.04-3.75). Gestational hypertension was significantly associated with any stroke (adjusted risk ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.26), ischemic stroke (adjusted risk ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.53), and hemorrhagic stroke (adjusted risk ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-6.98). Chronic hypertension was associated with ischemic stroke (adjusted risk ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.19). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, exposure to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including preeclampsia and gestational hypertension, seems to be associated with an increased risk for any stroke and ischemic stroke among parous patients in later life. Preventive interventions may be warranted for patients who experience hypertensive disorders of pregnancy to reduce their long-term risk for stroke.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.028 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".