MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361205622 · doi:10.33083/joghat.2023.269

SAFRANBOLU DAN TAŞKÖPRÜ YE KUYU KEBABI: BİR GASTRONOMİ ROTASI ÖNERİSİ (KUYU KEBAB FROM SAFRANBOLU TO TAŞKÖPRÜ: A GASTRONOMİC ROUTE PROPOSAL)

2023· article· en· W4361205622 on OpenAlexaff
Sibel AYYILDIZ, Nuray Türker, Burak Pınaroğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Gastronomy Hospitality and Travel (joghat) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCulinary Culture and Tourism
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bu araştırmanın konusunu Batı Karadeniz bölgesinin önemli yöresel lezzetlerinden biri olan Kuyu kebabı oluşturmaktadır.Araştırma Batı Karadeniz Bölgesinin hazırlaması zahmetli olan ve ustalık gerektiren yiyeceklerinden biri olan Kuyu Kebabının tarihsel arka planını, kebabın hazırlanışını, pişirilmesini ve sunumunu, bölge mutfağındaki yerini ve önemini, tüketim alışkanlıklarını, kuyu kebabı satan işletmeleri (lokantaları) ortaya çıkarmayı ve bu işletmeleri bir gastronomi rotası dahilinde ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.Nitel araştırma deseniyle yürütülen çalışma 30 Temmuz-7 Ağustos 2022 tarihleri arasında Batı Karadeniz Bölgesinde Safranbolu'dan Taşköprü Kastamonu'ya kuyu kebabı sunan yiyecek işletmeleri üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmış, dokuz lokanta ile yapılan yüz yüze görüşmelerden elde edilen veriler betimsel analiz yapılarak yorumlanmıştır.Batı Karadenizde kuyu kebabı satan işletmeler Safranbolu'dan Kastamonu-Taşköprü'ye kadar uzanan bir rota dahilinde harita üzerinde işaretlenmiştir.Bu rotada dört tanesi Safranbolu'da hizmet veren toplamda dokuz tane kuyu kebabı satan işletme bulunmaktadır.Bu işletmelerin tarihleri çok eskiye dayanmaktadır.Araştırmada kuyu kebabının bölgede gastronomi turizminin gelişmesine katkı sağladığı belirlenmiştir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Gastronomy Hospitality and Travel (joghat)Same topicCulinary Culture and TourismFrench-language works237,207