Machine Learning Analysis of Hyperspectral Images of Damaged Wheat Kernels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a disease of small grains caused by the fungus Fusarium graminearum. In this study, we explored the use of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) to evaluate the damage caused by FHB in wheat kernels. We evaluated the use of HSI for disease classification and correlated the damage with the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) content. Computational analyses were carried out to determine which machine learning methods had the best accuracy to classify different levels of damage in wheat kernel samples. The classes of samples were based on the DON content obtained from Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). We found that G-Boost, an ensemble method, showed the best performance with 97% accuracy in classifying wheat kernels into different severity levels. Mask R-CNN, an instance segmentation method, was used to segment the wheat kernels from HSI data. The regions of interest (ROIs) obtained from Mask R-CNN achieved a high mAP of 0.97. The results from Mask R-CNN, when combined with the classification method, were able to correlate HSI data with the DON concentration in small grains with an R2 of 0.75. Our results show the potential of HSI to quantify DON in wheat kernels in commercial settings such as elevators or mills.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".