MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361247336 · doi:10.1055/s-0042-1758471

Embryology and Clinical Development of the Human Olfactory System

2023· article· en· W4361247336 on OpenAlexaff
Harvey B. Sarnat, Laura Flores‐Sarnat

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Neurology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlfactory bulbOlfactory systemNeuroscienceAnterior olfactory nucleusOlfactionMedicineSensory systemCentral nervous systemAnatomyBiologyOlfactory tubercle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The olfactory system is unique as a special sensory system in its developmental neuroanatomy and function. Neonatal olfactory reflexes can be detected in the fetus from 30 weeks gestation and can be tested in term and preterm neonates and older children. Most efferent axons from the olfactory bulb terminate in the anterior olfactory nucleus within the olfactory tract, with secondary projections to the amygdala, hypothalamus, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortex (parahippocampal gyrus), with tertiary projections also to the insula and other cortical regions. The olfactory bulb and tract incorporate an intrinsic thalamic equivalent. The olfactory bulb may be primary in generating olfactory auras in some cases of temporal lobe epilepsy. Developmental malformations may involve the olfactory bulb and tract, isolated or as part of complex cerebral malformations and genetic syndromes. Primary neural tumors may arise in the olfactory bulb or nerve. Impaired olfaction occurs in neonatal hypoxic/ischemic and some metabolic encephalopathies. Loss of sense of smell are early symptoms in some neurodegenerative diseases and in some viral respiratory diseases including coronavirus disease 2019. Testing cranial nerve I is easy and reliable at all ages, and is recommended in selected neonates with suspected brain malformations or encephalopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.223
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.104 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric NeurologySame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207