Systematic assessment of plasma biomarkers in spinocerebellar ataxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Plasma neurofilament light (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), phosphorylated-tau (p-tau), and β-amyloid (Aβ) have emerged as promising markers in several neurodegenerative disorders, but whether they can be used as biomarkers in spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA) is yet to be determined. This study aimed to identify sensitive plasma markers for SCA and investigate their effectiveness in tracking ataxia severity, cognition, non-motor symptoms, and brain atrophy. METHODS: This observational study recruited consecutive participants from Huashan Hospital and the CABLE study from November 2019. Patients with SCA were genetically diagnosed, grouped according to the ataxia severity, and compared with healthy older individuals and patients with multiple system atrophy type C (MSA-C). Plasma NfL, GFAP, p-tau, and Aβ levels were measured by Simoa in all participants. Analysis of covariance, Spearman correlation, and multivariable regression were used to explore candidate markers in SCA. RESULTS: A total of 190 participants (60 SCA, 56 MSA-C, and 74 healthy controls) were enrolled. Plasma NfL level increased early in the pre-ataxic stage of SCA (32.23 ± 3.07 vs. 11.41 ± 6.62 pg/mL in controls), was positively associated with the ataxia severity (r = 0.45, P = 0.005) and CAG repeat length (r = 0.51, P = 0.001), varied among the different SCA subtypes (39.57 ± 13.50 pg/mL in SCA3, which was higher than 28.17 ± 8.02 pg/mL in SCA2, 17.08 ± 6.78 pg/mL in SCA8, and 24.44 ± 18.97 pg/mL in rare SCAs; P < 0.05), and was associated with brainstem atrophy. NfL alone (area under the curve [AUC] 0.867) or combined with p-tau181 and Aβ (AUC 0.929), showed excellent performance in discriminating SCA patients from controls. Plasma GFAP distinguished SCA from MSA-C with moderate accuracy (AUC > 0.700) and correlated with cognitive performance and cortical atrophy. Changes in levels of p-tau181 and Aβ were observed in SCA patients compared to controls. They were both correlated with cognition, while Aβ was also associated with non-motor symptoms, such as anxiety and depression. DISCUSSION: Plasma NfL may serve as a sensitive biomarker for SCA, and its level is elevated in the pre-ataxic stage. The different performance of NfL and GFAP indicates differences in the underlying neuropathology of SCA and MSA-C. Moreover, amyloid markers may be useful for detecting memory dysfunction and other non-motor symptoms in SCA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".