MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361269669 · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.03.002

Epicardially secreted fibronectin drives cardiomyocyte maturation in 3D-engineered heart tissues

2023· article· en· W4361269669 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lay Ping Ong, Johannes Bargehr, Vincent Knight-Schrijver, Jonathan Lee, Maria Colzani, Semih Bayraktar, William G. Bernard, Silvia Marchianò, Alessandro Bertero, Charles E. Murry, Laure Gambardella, Sanjay Sinha

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUK Research and InnovationMedical Research CouncilCentre de Recherches MathématiquesBritish Heart FoundationWellcome Trust
KeywordsBiologyFibronectinCell biologyImmunologyExtracellular matrix

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemic heart failure is due to irreversible loss of cardiomyocytes. Preclinical studies showed that human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes could remuscularize infarcted hearts and improve cardiac function. However, these cardiomyocytes remained immature. Incorporating hPSC-derived epicardial cells has been shown to improve cardiomyocyte maturation, but the exact mechanisms are unknown. We posited epicardial fibronectin (FN1) as a mediator of epicardial-cardiomyocyte crosstalk and assessed its role in driving hPSC-derived cardiomyocyte maturation in 3D-engineered heart tissues (3D-EHTs). We found that the loss of FN1 with peptide inhibition F(pUR4), CRISPR-Cas9-mediated FN1 knockout, or tetracycline-inducible FN1 knockdown in 3D-EHTs resulted in immature cardiomyocytes with decreased contractile function, and inefficient Ca 2+ handling. Conversely, when we supplemented 3D-EHTs with recombinant human FN1, we could recover hPSC-derived cardiomyocyte maturation. Finally, our RNA-sequencing analyses found FN1 within a wider paracrine network of epicardial-cardiomyocyte crosstalk, thus solidifying FN1 as a key driver of hPSC-derived cardiomyocyte maturation in 3D-EHTs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ReportsSame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207