MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361275152 · doi:10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100072

A Cross-Sectional Study of the Associations between Biomarkers of Vitamin D, Iron Status, and Hemoglobin in South African Women of Reproductive Age: the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative, South Africa

2023· article· en· W4361275152 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of the Witwatersrand, JohannesburgMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSouth African Medical Research CouncilDepartment of Science and Innovation, South Africa
KeywordsIron statusCross-sectional studyHemoglobinDemographyMedicineGerontologyVitaminEnvironmental healthAnemiaPhysiologyIron deficiencyEndocrinologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitamin D deficiency and anemia impact the health of women of reproductive age. Evidence suggests an inverse relationship between serum vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]) and anemia/iron deficiency, but less is known about these associations in women of reproductive age, in particular in a setting with a combined burden of micronutrient deficiency, food insecurity, and obesity. We aimed to assess the associations between 25(OH)D and biomarkers of iron and anemia in a cohort of women of reproductive age from Soweto, South Africa. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was also assessed. In this cross-sectional substudy of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI) South Africa pilot trial, 25(OH)D, iron markers (ferritin and soluble transferrin receptor [sTFR]), and altitude-adjusted hemoglobin (Hb) were measured in 493 women aged 18 to 25 years. Associations between iron deficiency/anemia and vitamin D status were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for confounders including fat mass index (FMI). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to evaluate direct and indirect pathways between 25(OH)D, iron and anemia markers, and covariates. Of 493 participants, 136 (27.6%) had vitamin D insufficiency (25(OH)D ≥12–20 ng/mL), whereas 28 (5.6%) had vitamin D deficiency (<12 ng/mL). Anemia and iron deficiency were not significantly associated with vitamin D category (25(OH)D<20 ng/mL compared with ≥20 ng/mL) in multivariable logistic regression analyses. In SEM, log-transformed 25(OH)D was not significantly associated with Hb, ferritin, or sTFR, but it was significantly associated with season of data collection, hormonal contraceptive use, and FMI (total effects: B = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.104, 0.236, P < 0.001; B: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.041, 0.154, P < 0.001; B: -0.01, 95%CI: -0.016, -0.003, P = 0.003, respectively). No significant association between vitamin D (25(OH)D), anemia (Hb), and iron markers was found. The inverse relationship between FMI and vitamin D status emphasizes the overlap between adiposity and micronutrient deficiencies in young South African women, exacerbating their risk of disease development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it