MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361298315 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560114

Data Driven Sigmoid Proportional-Integral-Derivative (SPID) Controller for Twin Rotor MIMO System

2023· article· en· W4361298315 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiti Malaysia Pahang
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Sigmoid functionRotor (electric)Controller (irrigation)MIMOComputer scienceMathematicsControl engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a data driven Sigmoid Proportional-Integral-Derivation (SPID) controller for a Twin Rotor Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output (MIMO) System (TRMS).A time-varying PID parameters based on sigmoid function is adopted to solve the low control accuracy of the conventional PID controller.In particular, the parameters of new version controller were vigorously changed based on its error signal of sigmoid function where its variability is limited in a predefined upper and lower bound.These SPID parameters are then optimized by using Adaptive Safe Experimentation Dynamics (ASED) method such that the control performance accuracy in terms of trajectory tracking error and control input energy are minimized.The simulations of step response analysis and stability analysis are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed SPID controller compared to PID controller on TRMS system.Consequently, the results obtained from the simulations revealed that the SPID controller has successfully produced improvement in terms of objective function, , total norm of error, ̅ 1 + ̅ 2 and total norm of output, ̅ ℎ + ̅ by reduced 6.84%, 6.38% and 4.25%, respectively compared to the PID controller.In addition, the results of Integral-Absolute-Error (IAE), Integral-Square-Error (ISE), Integral-Time-Absolute-Error (ITAE) and Integral-Square-Error (ITSE) are proven that the SPID controller is outperform on horizontal and vertical planes for TRMS system in comparison with PID controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it