MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

“A approach for Hybrid Security Management in Health Care for Secure Cloud Storage: A Review”

2022· article· en· W4361793983 on OpenAlexaff
Roshni Bhave, Purva Gogte Vyawahare, Swati Shamkuwar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingFlexibility (engineering)Computer scienceHealth careComputer securityVariety (cybernetics)Wireless sensor networkWirelessTransmission (telecommunications)Computer networkTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A full day's worth of activities can be covered by cloud-based health-care services. All previous Walk abnormality detection methods have focused on the walk association constant. The goal of this research is to use cloud computing to improve the health-care system. To assist the medical community in early detection of a patient's primary organs' health status, allowing for proper treatment, as well as to securely store patient health data in the cloud. The goal of the project is to demonstrate how a sensory system can be used to track a patient's movement invisibly. In recent studies, wireless sensor networks have been employed to structure remote care systems. This, like the cloud, is used to relay physiological signals. Cloud computing and health monitoring are becoming increasingly popular in healthcare. COF-based communication transmission systems are still in operation, despite the fact that safe services are employed to monitor 24 hours a day. Secures services allow for more network flexibility, a larger number of nodes, and a longer transmission range while using less energy. The large number of nodes enables the spread of such systems. Secure wireless networks have recently been put to the test in a variety of settings. The proposed patient monitoring system would benefit medical practitioners in terms of correct diagnosis and treatment, as well as health care providers in terms of illness management. The patient is being watched, and the data transmitted to the computer is being tracked. Signals are sent to the patient's or doctor's monitor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207