Reconceptualisation of Corporate Social Responsibility Model in the Era of Sustainable Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility must be based on the principle of social justice so that the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility will not burden one party resulting in the ineffective implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility.This research aims to reconceptualize the model of Corporate Social Responsibility in the legal framework in the era of sustainable development to realize social justice.This research is legal research with the type of empirical legal research.Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility does not mean that the state delegates its overall responsibility to business actors but invites business actors to work together to create sustainable development and improve people's quality of life.Social problems can only be solved through social engineering because the causes and consequences are multidimensional and involve many people.This reconceptualization includes Reconceptualisation of the Idea of Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, which is carried out with the application of the Social Capital Concept; Reconceptualisation of Funding; Reconceptualisation of the Duties of the Central Government and Regional Governments; Reconceptualisation of the Corporate Social Responsibility Forum; Reconceptualisation of Awards; and Reconceptualisation of Administrative Sanctions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".