Development trends of trade and economic relations between Ukraine and NAFTA countries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methods. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is the work of domestic and foreign scientists. The results were obtained with the application of a system of methods. In particular, the methods of grouping, classification and quantitative comparisons were used in the study of the current economic condition of the NAFTA countries, the methods of structural and economic-statistical analysis were used to assess the main financial indicators of trade and economic relations between Ukraine and NAFTA countries, the graphic method was used for a visual representation of the obtained research results. Results. The article is devoted to the analysis of the main trends in the development of trade and economic relations between Ukraine and NAFTA countries. An analytical review of the current economic state of the USA, Canada and Mexico was carried out. The main drawbacks of the North American Free Trade Agreement have been revealed. The provisions of the new US-Canada-Mexico Agreement (USMCA), which was created to replace NAFTA, are characterized. The issue of economic cooperation between Ukraine and NAFTA countries was revealed. A detailed comparative analysis of the main statistical indicators regarding the development trends of Ukraine’s economic cooperation with NAFTA countries in the field of trade in goods and services was carried out. Novelty. The prospects for further development of Ukraine’s trade and economic relations with the NAFTA countries were determined. Practical value. The analysis of the dynamics of export-import operations between Ukraine and NAFTA countries makes it possible to predict the development trends of their economic relations in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".