Hot, Wide, Continental Back-arcs Explain Earth’s Enigmatic mid-Proterozoic Magmatic and Metamorphic Record
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Higher than average thermobaric ratios (temperature/pressure) of metamorphic rocks and abundant ‘dry’ ferroan magmatism including massif anorthosite suites are two enigmatic features of the mid-Proterozoic (1.85–0.85 Ga) that have unclear origins. It has been proposed that elevated mantle temperatures due to insulation under the Columbia supercontinent, and/or to plate slowdown, combined with thin lithosphere, led to high continental geothermal gradients, high-temperature metamorphism, and an increase in dry, ferroan magmatism. Geodynamic modelling predicts that continental subduction zones at mid-Proterozoic mantle potential temperatures (80–150 °C hotter than at present) would exhibit key differences to the Phanerozoic, critically, extensive slab rollback combined with greater volumes of decompression melting of the asthenosphere would lead to wide regions of back-arc magmatism. We posit that these hot, wide continental back-arcs can effectively explain the abundance of ferroan magmatism, anorthosite suites, and high T/P metamorphism. Our model negates the need for extra mantle heating from supercontinental insulation or plate slowdown and shows that the tectonic regime of the mid-Proterozoic was a transitional phase between those of the Archean (likely comprising peel-back tectonics and episodic subduction) and the Phanerozoic (comprising deep continental subduction), and which could have resulted solely from secular cooling of the mantle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".