MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4361988949 · doi:10.47772/ijriss.2023.7301

Consumption Pattern Analysis of Water Consumption For Commercial Connections in Davao City

2023· article· en· W4361988949 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Verlie S. Tuyor, Aristeo C. Salapa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsumption (sociology)Water consumptionQuarter (Canadian coin)Water sourceEnvironmental scienceAgricultural economicsStatisticsHydrology (agriculture)GeographyMathematicsWater resource managementEngineeringEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study applied the fundamental time series analysis to evaluate the distribution, trend, and later forecast of water consumption for commercial connections by classification of Davao City Water District (DCWD). As such, this study examined the relationship between time and the water consumption of Davao City’s commercial connections over time. The monthly water consumption of commercial connections, categorized by classification per water source systems, was the data source for this study, which ran from January 2015 to December 2019. The four categories of commercial connections’ time series statistics suggested that, from 24 million cubic meters in 2018, commercial consumption dropped to 20 million cubic meters in 2019. This decline is explained by a decrease in consumption of commercials 2.0 and 1.25 classification. The data showed that during the first quarter of the year, increases were observed within five years (short-term). For commercial type 2.0, in 2022, forecasted water consumption would reach 14 million cubic meters in some improved areas of operations. Hence, specific forecasting by type of connection requires in-depth analysis. Thus, further study is required for long-term forecasting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.239
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Research and Innovation in Social ScienceSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207