Radiogenic Pb in xenotime trapped in nanoscale inclusions of apatite during fluid alteration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study focuses on the low-temperature mineralogical response of xenotime, a phosphate mineral routinely used as a geochronometer, to fluid-assisted alteration. The studied xenotime grain (z6413) comes from a ∼ 1000 Ma pegmatite from the Grenville Province, Canada, and is commonly used as reference material for UPb analyses. At the microscale, the grain has a mottled texture, sub-micrometer porosity, and small domains dark in backscattered electron (BSE) images that are characterised by curviplanar, sharp boundaries. The small dark BSE domains are associated with Th-U-rich inclusions and larger porosity (2–3 μm) and are interpreted to result from localised fluid-assisted coupled dissolution-reprecipitation. Sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) UPb analyses of unaltered and fluid-affected domains yield concordant crystallisation dates, irrespective of the textural domains. The apparently unaltered xenotime domain was characterised at the nanoscale to determine if the grain was affected by fluids beyond the altered domains defined by BSE imaging. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging results indicate the presence of randomly distributed Ca + Pb nanoscale precipitates. Atom probe tomography (APT) reveals the presence of spherical clusters (4 to 18 nm in size) enriched in radiogenic Pb, Ca, and Si atoms, which, combined with TEM observations, are interpreted as nanoscale inclusions of apatite. In addition to the inclusions, a dislocation enriched in Ca and fluid mobile elements such as Cl, Li, Na, and Mn was imaged from APT data indicating percolating of fluids further than the reaction front. APT 206Pb/238U nanogeochronology indicates that the nanoscale inclusions of apatite formed at 863 ± 28 Ma, 100–150 Ma after crystallisation of the host xenotime, with its formation attributed to fluid metasomatism. This study shows that fluid-xenotime reaction caused Pb* to be redistributed at the nanoscale, recording the timing of metasomatism. However, at the scale of SHRIMP analytical spot (10 μm), xenotime is concordant, indicating that Pb was not mobile at the microscale and fluid-altered xenotime can preserve its crystallisation age. Although the studied grain shows a limited amount of altered domains in BSE imaging, nanoscale analyses reveal a more pervasive re-equilibration of the minerals through the percolation of fluids along dislocations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".