Numerical Investigation of Flow-Induced Vibration for Cylinder-Plate Assembly at low Reynolds Number
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The transverse flow-induced vibration (FIV) of an elastically-supported cylinder-plate assembly (viz., a rigid splitter-plate attached to the downstream side of a circular cylinder) with a low mass ratio of 10 and zero structural damping is investigated using numerical simulations at a Reynolds number of 100. The structural oscillations and characteristics of the flow around the structure are analyzed in terms of the vibration characteristics and the fluid forces as a function of the plate length LSP and the reduced velocity Ur. These investigations involve a wide range of plate lengths LSP/D = 0–4 (where D is the cylinder diameter) over an extensive span of reduced velocities Ur = 2–30. For LSP/D ≤ 0.5, self-limiting oscillations are induced in the assembly—these oscillations correspond to either a vortex-induced vibration (VIV) or an integrated VIV-galloping response. For LSP/D ≥ 0.75, the amplitude response is no longer self-limiting in the sense that the oscillation amplitude increases linearly with increasing Ur—these oscillations correspond to either a strongly correlated VIV-galloping regime (for LSP/D = 0.75), or two clearly separated regimes: namely, a VIV regime with small-amplitude oscillation and a non-limiting galloping regime (for LSP/D > 0.75).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".