Trust, Deceit, and Disgust Within the Marriage Between Lucrezia and Nicia in La Mandragola by Machiavelli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Niccolo Machiavelli (1469 - 1527) is most famous for his instructional book, The Prince, however, he experienced greater success during his lifetime for his play La Mandragola. The play is centred around one man's efforts, Callimaco, in having sex with Lucrezia, a young woman who is married to an older man, Messer Nicia. Despite being married for six years, the marriage between Lucrezia and Nicia has not yielded a child - this was unusual. Trickery ensues, with the play ending with Callimaco successfully duping Nicia and ‘getting the girl,’ with Lucrezia and Callimaco confident in their ability to continue this affair going forward. The unfortunate marriage dynamic of Lucrezia and Nicia was not one that was created because it differed from the norm, but rather the typical marriage culture and gender expectations of the time contributed to the discord of their marriage. Neither partner has respect for the other; Nicia has a certain level of complacency, perhaps even avoidance or fear, of Lucrezia and being reproached. On the other hand, Lucrezia sees Nicia as dim-witted and seeks many opportunities to avoid physical contact with him. Machiavelli provides a rich and nuanced picture of married life, albeit exaggerated at times as part of the larger plot of La Mandragola. The marriage of Nicia and Lucrezia also reveals that there is much more behind prescribed gender roles of being fertile and economically capable when it comes to compatibility within the confines of typical marriages in Renaissance Italy. The disrespect and dislike seen in the marriage between Lucrezia and Nicia is amplified through neither character satisfying gender expectations, and existing in a marriage dynamic that was, while common, still problematic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".