MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362502970 · doi:10.5376/gab.2023.14.0002

Identification of COR413 Gene Family in Peach and Its Expression in Low Temperature and LTC Treatment at Postharvest

2023· article· en· W4362502970 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shuaijie Li, Wenna Zhang, Zhigang Zhang, Yaqin Zheng, Zhenning Liu, Meng Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueGenomics and Applied Biology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicResearch on scale insects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersZhejiang University
KeywordsPostharvestHorticultureBiologySubfamilyMethyl jasmonateGeneAbscisic acidBrowningBotanyGene familyGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peach were susceptible to chilling injury during low temperature (0 o C) storage at postharvest, and LTC (Low temperature conditioning) treatment could reduce chilling injury such as of H 2 O 2 production and fruit browning. In order to study the function of peach COR413 in the regulation of postharvest chilling injury in peach ‘Beijing No. 9’, four COR413 gene family members were identified based on the peach genome database, namely PpCOR1 ~ PpCOR4 . Phylogenetic analysis showed that the four PpCORs could be clustered into two subfamilies. PpCOR1 ~ PpCOR3 belonged to the first subfamily, and most of the members in this subfamily were located in plasma membrane. PpCOR4 belongs to the second subfamily, and its members are mainly located in thylakoid membrane. The cis-acting elements analysis of PpCORs promoter showed that PpCOR3 contained abundant abiotic stress responsive and hormone responsive elements such as jasmonate and abscisic acid. The results of gene expression showed that PpCOR3 was induced by low temperature while LTC treatment could repress the induction of PpCOR3 by low temperature. Interestingly, the expression of PpCOR3 was positively correlated with the change of H 2 O 2 content in peach, which indicated that PpCOR 3 was involved in the regulation of postharvest chilling injury in peach fruit. This result provides a theoretical basis for the study of postharvest storage and quality maintenance of peach fruit as well as the breeding of cold resistant peach varieties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomics and Applied BiologySame topicResearch on scale insectsFrench-language works237,207