MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362509848 · doi:10.1353/nai.2023.0032

Our Whole Gwich’in Way of Life Has Changed / Gwich’in K’yuu Gwiidandài’ Tthak Ejuk Gòonlih Stories from the People of the Land by Leslie McCartney and The Gwich’in Tribal Council

2023· article· en· W4362509848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Crystal Gail Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousOral historyColonialismNarrativeHistorySociologyGender studiesMedia studiesArchaeologyArtEcologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Our Whole Gwich’in Way of Life Has Changed / Gwich’in K’yuu Gwiidandài’ Tthak Ejuk Gòonlih Stories from the People of the Land by Leslie McCartney and The Gwich’in Tribal Council Crystal Gail Fraser (bio) Our Whole Gwich’in Way of Life Has Changed / Gwich’in K’yuu Gwiidandài’ Tthak Ejuk Gòonlih Stories from the People of the Land by Leslie McCartney and The Gwich’in Tribal Council University of Alberta Press, 2020 this magnificent, 848-page volume by anthropologist Leslie McCartney and the Gwich’in Tribal Council (GTC) includes the oral histories of Dinjii Zhuh Elders: the lived experiences of eighteen women and six men. The book is “structured to give the reader a general background to the Gwich’in people and their traditional lands” (xvi). Histories of northern Canada and Indigenous Peoples who have inhabited those Lands since Time Immemorial are few and far between; this collection makes a significant contribution to our understanding of Dinjii Zhuh histories, the methodology of oral histories, and Indigenous engagement in scholarly research. As reflected during my lifetime as a Gwichyà Gwich’in woman, the dominant voices in this collection of personal narratives are Elders. Again and again, they command our attention and demonstrate their expertise in their use of our language (Dinjii Zhuh Ginjik) and on-the-Land skills such as hunting, moosehide tanning, traveling, and parenting. With all Indigenous testimonies, the hard histories of colonialism, Indian Residential Schooling, disease, and trauma lie just below the surface, but they are countered by the radiant sense of humor among Dinjii Zhuh. Elder Sarah Ann (Firth) Gard-lund says, “Lots of times, funny things happened to me” as she recounts her delight in winning curling matches against the aggrieved white school-teacher in Aklavik (260). When our own people undertake research related to Dinjii Zhuh, it warms my heart. I can turn to very few books that document the words of my maternal grandmother, delicate information about her mother, and the history of our people—Dinjii Zhuh—more generally. This collection represents how one generation understood not only our identities but also our responsibilities. My grandmother Marka (née Andre) Bullock recorded her story for this volume when she was seventy-five years old. I often visited her during this time, and Marka had already begun thinking about her transition to the next world, which was grounded in the importance of our fish camp and the seasonal nature of our culture and lifestyle: “Sometimes I think if [End Page 142] I get lost, if I just go to Tsiigehtshik and lose myself, and continue my journey to Dachan Choo G˛éhnjik, that’s where they will find me. I would be just happy. I would go very happy” (569). Because of Marka, I continue to return to Dachan Choo G˛éhnjik where I learn the lessons of how to be a matriarch on our Land, at our fish camp, and alongside my young daughter. The crucial role that Dinjii Zhuh women played and their connection to the Land not only runs through Marka’s story but among all twenty-four life narratives, whether told by women or men. Dinjii Zhuh Elders frequently state, “Listen to what I’m saying,” which is the title of chapter 25. Here, McCartney and the GTC seek to bridge the divide between the people of a generation who grew up on the Land with Dinjii Zhuh values and the younger generation living in the Dinjii Zhuh diaspora who may not be connected to their families, Homelands, and ancestral teachings. These “Gwich’in values include respect, honour, love, kindness, dance/song, laughter/humour, teaching, our stories, spirituality, honesty and fairness, sharing, and caring. In their stories, the Elders spoke of all of these things” (621–22). Because these values were documented and now available to all Dinjii Zhuh, we can collectively learn new ways to make and sustain relationships, care for our children and families, and go forward with our lives in a good and ancestral way. As a testament to the intent of this book—a resource for Dinjii Zhuh citizens and community—related scholarly literature is not discussed until...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNative American and Indigenous StudiesSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207