MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4362513161 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15373

Reshaping Memory: Counter-Narratives in Kindertransport Literature

2023· dissertation· en· W4362513161 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Marie-Catherine Allard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersAzrieli Foundation
KeywordsNarrativeThe HolocaustLiteratureHistoryBiographyLife writingAestheticsSociologyPsychoanalysisArtPsychologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the literary narratives (both non-fictional and fictional) of child Holocaust survivors who were evacuated on one of the Kindertransports to Britain focusing in particular on the writing of Karen Gershon, Ruth Barnett, and Josef Eisinger. My focus is on the Kinder's numerous retellings of their experience across different genres. I demonstrate that by transposing their story from one genre to the next the Kinder's narratives make observable the constructive process of memory and its mediated character. I argue that by continuously rewriting their Kindertransport experience, Gershon, Barnett, and Eisinger shed light on generally silenced elements of their evacuation. Their retellings challenge the British celebratory narrative, and reshape discourses around the history and memory of this rescue operation. Together, Gershon, Barnett, and Eisinger's accounts provide alternative perspectives on the Kindertransport based on their age, gender, emigration, and postwar relationships with surviving parents and relatives. Each of their corpuses encourages new dialogues in Kindertransport studies and introduces different literary genres to Kindertransport literature. Gershon's publications, ranging from her poems on the Jewish condition to her novels on the estrangement of German Jewish refugees in Britain, complicates perceptions of the redemptive celebratory narrative by complicating Britain's hospitable image. Barnett's corpus, which began with her academic publications in the field of psychology and eventually came to include an autobiography and a play, challenges the selective celebratory narrative around the Kinder's survival and adaptation in Britain by describing the after-effects of the partitioning of families on the Kinder. Eisinger's memoir, Flight and Refuge, composed of his wartime diary entries and retrospective commentary on these entries, exposes the power dynamics at stake in the deportation of older male Kinder from Britain to Canada. His narrative addresses the transnational character of this operation and the Kindertransport memory of Britain's former colonies, despite the centrality of Britain in the memorialization of the Kindertransport. In addition to introducing new paradigms in Kindertransport studies, my analysis of Gershon, Barnett, and Eisinger's respective corpuses confirms the importance of literary representations of the Kindertransport in preventing its narrative from remaining an oversimplified and solely celebratory one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207