Comparative efficacy of modified-live and inactivated vaccines in boosting disease-sparing responses to bovine viral diarrhea virus challenge in neonatally mucosally primed weanling beef calves.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study compares immune and clinical responses of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV)-maternal antibody (MatAb)-positive beef calves primed with intranasal modified-live virus vaccine (MLV) and differentially boosted with a systemic MLV or an inactivated vaccine (KV). Animal: Eighteen commercial Black Angus steers. Procedure: Calves were mucosally primed at ~24 h of age with an MLV and boosted by injection of a MLV (IN-MLV) or inactivated vaccine (IN-KV) at an average age of 54 d. Challenge occurred at weaning with a virulent non-cytopathic BVDV-2 strain, 24515. Results: Clinically, the IN-KV group had a longer duration of fever, leukopenia, and viremia, whereas the IN-MLV group had greater BVDV Types-1 and -2 heterospecific antibody responses. Conclusion: Altogether, these data indicated that systemic MLV boosting resulted in a more robust protection to BVDV Type-2 challenge at weaning. Clinical relevance: Mucosal prime-boosting of neonatal calves provided protection against BVDV Type-2 challenge at weaning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".