MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362525148 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-1891

Abstract 1891: Breaking barriers to access intracellular targets with T-cell engagers: Discovery of diverse, developable, and ultra-specific antibodies against a MAGE-A4 pMHC

2023· article· en· W4362525148 on OpenAlexaff
Davide Tortora, Peter B. F. Bergqvist, Grace P. Leung, Elena Viganò, Antonios Samiotakis, Harveer Dhupar, Wei Wei, Shirley Zhi, Yukiko Sato, Allison Goodman, Cindy-Lee Crichlow, Melissa Cid, Jéssica Fernandes Scortecci, Ping Xiang, Ahn Lee, Vivian Li, Stephanie K Masterman, Sherie Duncan, Aaron P. Yamniuk, Kush Dalal, Timothy M. Jacobs, Raffi Tonikian, Bryan C. Barnhart

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsAbCellera (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntibodyMajor histocompatibility complexComputational biologyAntigenIntracellularMHC class IBiologyCell biologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, we describe the discovery of antibodies against a MAGE-A4 peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC). These antibodies will form the basis for the tumor-binding arm of T-cell engagers (TCEs) against this target. Bispecific CD3 TCEs have the potential to transform cancer treatment by redirecting T cells to tumor targets, but technological barriers have limited their development for solid tumors. Targets for TCEs have generally been limited to surface-expressed proteins, however, access to intracellular proteins that are mutated and/or differentially expressed in cancer cells would expand the target pool. Peptides of these intracellular proteins presented on MHC class I (MHC-I) provide opportunities for TCE development. Technologies powering discovery of rare antibodies that are ultra-specific, high-affinity pMHC binders are needed to expand this promising class of tumor targets. We have developed a technology platform for the discovery of optimal TCEs, including a diverse panel of CD3-binding antibodies and an antibody discovery and development engine that includes multispecific engineering capabilities, powered by OrthoMabTM. We are applying this platform to develop TCEs against MAGE-A4, an intracellular tumor target expressed by many solid tumors, but not by healthy tissues. Using proprietary immunization technologies, we triggered robust, diverse antibody responses against a complex of a human MAGE-A4 peptide presented on MHC-I. We used high-throughput microfluidic technology to screen single B cells using a multiplexed bead-binding assay to identify antibodies specific to the target, but not closely-related pMHCs. We then expressed and purified antibodies for downstream validation and characterization. Antibody specificity was initially validated using a panel of related pMHC complexes, and developability properties were assessed, including hydrophobicity, self-association, polyspecificity, stability, and aggregation. With complex data integration and analysis, we identified a panel of diverse and developable antibodies that bind with high affinity to a human MAGE-A4 peptide sequence of 10 amino acids presented on MHC-I (HLA:02*01). Strategic selection and pairing of these target-binding antibodies with our large and diverse panel of fully human CD3-binders will power the discovery of ultra-specific MAGE-A4 TCEs with optimal potency and cytokine release. Citation Format: Davide Tortora, Peter Bergqvist, Grace P. Leung, Elena Vigano, Antonios Samiotakis, Harveer Dhupar, Wei Wei, Shirley R. Zhi, Yukiko Sato, Allison Goodman, Cindy-Lee Crichlow, Melissa Cid, Jessica Fernandes Scortecci, Ping Xiang, Ahn Lee, Vivian Li, Stephanie Masterman, Sherie Duncan, Aaron Yamniuk, Kush Dalal, Tim Jacobs, Raffi Tonikian, Bryan C. Barnhart. Breaking barriers to access intracellular targets with T-cell engagers: Discovery of diverse, developable, and ultra-specific antibodies against a MAGE-A4 pMHC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1891.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→