MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4362534734 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-4338

Abstract 4338: Response to neoadjuvant targeted therapy in operable head and neck cancer confers survival benefit

2023· article· en· W4362534734 on OpenAlexaff
Marco A. Mascarella, Tolani Olonisakin, Purva Rumde, Varun Vendra, Melonie A. Nance, Seungwon Kim, Mark Kubik, Shaum Sridharan, Robert L. Ferris, Moon J. Fenton, Daniel Clayburgh, James Ohr, Malabika Sen, Sonali Joyce, James G. Herman, Jennifer R. Grandis, Dan P. Zandberg, Umamaheswar Duvvuri

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeoadjuvant therapyInternal medicineHazard ratioOncologyProportional hazards modelStage (stratigraphy)CancerSurgeryBreast cancerConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Neoadjuvant targeted therapy provides a brief, preoperative ‘window of opportunity’ that can be exploited to individualize cancer care based on treatment response. We investigated whether response to neoadjuvant therapy during the preoperative window confers survival benefit in patients with operable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients and Methods: A pooled analysis of treatment naïve patients with operable HNSCC enrolled in one of three clinical trials from 2009-2020 (NCT00779389, NCT01218048, NCT02473731). Neoadjuvant regimens consisted of EGFR inhibitors (n=83) or anti-ErbB3 antibody therapy (n=9) within 28 days of surgery. Clinical to pathologic stage migration was compared to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) while adjusting for confounding factors using multivariable Cox regression. Circulating tumor markers validated in other solid tumor models were analyzed. Results: 92 of 118 patients were analyzed; all patients underwent surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical to pathologic downstaging was more frequent in patients undergoing neoadjuvant targeted therapy compared to a historic cohort without neoadjuvant therapy (P=0.048). Patients with pathologic downstage migration had the highest OS (89.5%, 95% CI 75.7-100) compared to those with no stage change (58%, 95% CI 46.2-69.8) or upstage (40%, 95% CI 9.6-70.4, P=0.003). On multivariable analysis, downstage migration remained a positive prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-0.90) while adjusting for measured confounders. Downstage migration correlated with decreased circulating tumor markers, SOX17 and TAC1 (P=0.0078). Conclusion: Brief neoadjuvant therapy achieved pathologic downstaging in a subset of patients and was associated with significantly better DFS and OS as well as decreased circulating methylated SOX17 and TAC1. Citation Format: Marco Antonio Mascarella, Tolani Olonisakin, Purva Rumde, Varun Vendra, Melonie Nance, Seungwon Kim, Mark Kubik, Shaum Sridharan, Robert Ferris, Moon Fenton, Daniel Clayburgh, James Ohr, Malabika Sen, Sonali Joyce, James Herman, Jennifer Grandis, Dan Zandberg, Umamaheswar Duvvuri. Response to neoadjuvant targeted therapy in operable head and neck cancer confers survival benefit. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4338.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicHead and Neck Cancer Studies→French-language works237,207→